| 3 comments ]

A few days back, in an internal management forum, we were talking about the increasing attrition and importance of retaining people. One of the PMs talked about how a few people in his team asked him " Why should we stay?"


That's really it. That's what we need to answer. If we don't have an answer to that (besides the nonsense about it being a challenge, and a fast growing oganisation etc.), then we don't have much of a chance.

What are the reasons for people to stay? Or, what do people look for? Here's the regular list:
  • Compensation: includes salary and stock options
  • Quality of work
  • Role
  • Quality of life ( relates to work life balance and the city you work in)
  • Brand
Let's consider a small services organisation that does not have the best pay scales, does not have much to offer in terms of work content, and where teams often come under schedule pressure. Is obviously not a recognized brand, and is located in Chandigarh ( Great quality of life, but not very relevant to most of the target employee group.)

What does such a company do ? Does it have no hope?

I think it does. It can do one thing that is relatively easy for a small organisation to do, and which can potentially make a big impact on employees, (although probably none on prospective employees.)

Try and be the best place to work at.

That's it. Everything else pretty much follows. I think one can start by putting together a few guiding principles. Use them to check each action and policy: if they don't fit into the principles, then they are acceptable. Here are some that I believe would be good ones:

  1. The small guy always wins: Whenever a decision can go both ways, err on the side of the employee. When creating a policy, use one that leans towards the employee.
  2. Believe in people: Create policies based around faith in people. Assume that people are honest. In most cases, they are, and the few dishonest instances will be far outweighed by the benefits of faith. For instance, don't count leaves from attendance on a daily level: just inform the manager on a monthly level, and let the manager take a call. If an employee asks for the ability to make business calls from home, accept that she needs it.
  3. Be pound wise, penny foolish: Don't bother with small expenses. A 200% hike in a shoelace price means nothing compared to a 1% hike in the shoe price. Don't put a tight control on RAM purchases while not controlling PC purchases.
  4. Don't always be an accountant: Not everything needs to fit exactly. If a team party budget is Rs. 300 per person per quarter, it is OK for it to go above 300 once in a while: it will balance out on the whole. (Other projects will use less. If everyone is using more, perhaps the budget needs to be increased.) If a little above 300 is not OK, people will ensure they never let it be a little below 300 either: they will use all of it!
  5. Communicate: Provide people information. Where are we, where are we going, how are we doing. Perhaps revenue and profit numbers. Definitely new accounts, new initiatives. Have executive management address people once in a quarter, send out mails regularly. Ask for feedback. Act on feedback. Keeping people informed encourages the belief that they matter.
  6. Empower: Involve people in decisions. Allow them to suggest and take ideas to completion. For a small company, having entrepreneurial employees is essential. You will keep them only if you empower them.
  7. Be open: Believe in transparency. If you have a cost constraint, admit it. Share with people the logic of decisions.
  8. What others do is not important: Don't look at what other companies are doing: that will at best make you the average. Do what fits in with your guiding principles. If you must compare, compare with the employers that top the employee satisfaction charts!





3 comments

Anonymous said... @ 2:07 PM

my vote goes for:

communicate.
empower.

however, they need to be handled very carefully or they can cause as much harm. For instance, the more information you share with people, the more reasons they find to complain about. They may not be able to parse information the way top management does and start questioning their wisdom.

I believe the base philosophy should be to focus on the inherent advantages of being small sized rather than trying to compete with a large organization on what a large organization can offer.

Ankur said... @ 4:43 PM

something u covered in action points but missed out in the main points,,,why shud i stay---because you and your work is respected here :-) if an employee is made to feel important and his voice is heard, he is less likely to go,,,but u have covered out almost all the points and i hope ur company listens to u and becomes a great place to work :-)

Ankur said... @ 2:02 PM

Nice observations. Very less companies can actually do it. As Tom Peters puts it (in "In Search of Excellence), its more like you have to manage a paradox, a basic human desire is to "be a part of something great, and still the need to stand apart".
Published By AnimeshS (http://animesh.wordpress.com) - December 22 10:49 PM


this was put as a comment on my blogpost linking to ur post.

Post a Comment